Talbert v. G.A.T. Airline Ground Support, Inc.

950 So. 2d 778, 2005 La.App. 1 Cir. 2215, 2006 La. App. LEXIS 2458, 2006 WL 3104897
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 3, 2006
DocketNo. 2005 CA 2215
StatusPublished

This text of 950 So. 2d 778 (Talbert v. G.A.T. Airline Ground Support, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Talbert v. G.A.T. Airline Ground Support, Inc., 950 So. 2d 778, 2005 La.App. 1 Cir. 2215, 2006 La. App. LEXIS 2458, 2006 WL 3104897 (La. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinions

MCDONALD, J.

_JjTMs is an appeal from the Office of Workers’ Compensation Administration. Lawrence D. Talbert filed a disputed claim for compensation against his employer, G.A.T. Airline Ground Support, Inc. (G.A.T.). On May 4, 2004, the parties entered into a consent judgment that found Mr. Talbert temporarily, totally disabled and provided for indemnity payments by G.A.T. to Mr. Talbert, along with other, related matters.

In April 2005, Mr. Talbert filed a motion to accelerate benefits, in accordance with La. R.S. 23:1333, asserting that G.A.T. had failed to pay six or more successive weekly indemnity payments. After a hearing, the workers’ compensation judge found that the consent judgment provided that G.A.T. would continue to pay benefits as long as benefits were compensable under the Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Act and that G.A.T. had proven that Mr. Talbert was no longer temporarily, totally disabled. Thus, the workers’ compensation judge denied the motion to accelerate benefits. Mr. Talbert appealed that judgment.

After a thorough review, we find that the record does not demonstrate that the workers’ compensation judge was clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous in its judgment. Accordingly, finding no error, we affirm the judgment in accordance with Uniform Rules — Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-16.1.B. Costs are assessed against appellant, Lawrence D. Talbert.

AFFIRMED.

WHIPPLE, J., concurs for reasons assigned.

CARTER, J., concurs for reasons assigned by WHIPPLE, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duncan v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Development
615 So. 2d 305 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1993)
Lytell v. Strickland Transp. Co., Inc.
373 So. 2d 138 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1979)
Dixon v. King
150 So. 385 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1933)
Lewis v. Cornerstone Village, Inc.
846 So. 2d 970 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
950 So. 2d 778, 2005 La.App. 1 Cir. 2215, 2006 La. App. LEXIS 2458, 2006 WL 3104897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talbert-v-gat-airline-ground-support-inc-lactapp-2006.