Talbert, C. v. Phila. CCP
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
CHARLES PRINCE EDWARD TALBERT, : No. 94 EM 2023 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON : PLEAS AND PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT : ATTORNEYS OFFICE, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2024, the “Mandamus Action” is DISMISSED.
See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid
representation is impermissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the
“Mandamus Action” to counsel of record.
The “Petition for Supplemental Mandamus” is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Talbert, C. v. Phila. CCP (Talbert, C. v. Phila. CCP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.