Talavera v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Talavera v. New York City Housing Authority

50 A.D.2d 897, 377 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12164

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 897 (Talavera v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Talavera v. New York City Housing Authority, 50 A.D.2d 897, 377 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12164 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (1) to annul respondent’s determination, dated January 10, 1974 and made after a hearing, which declared petitioner to be ineligible for continued occupancy of a certain apartment on the ground of nondesirability and (2) to restore her to the status of a desirable tenant. Determination confirmed and petition dismissed on the merits, without costs. It is our opinion that the determination under review is supported by substantial evidence presented at the fair hearing accorded petitioner and her husband by respondent. Rabin, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Margett and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (1) to annul respondent’s determination, dated January 10, 1974 and made after a hearing, which declared petitioner to be ineligible for continued occupancy of a certain apartment on the ground of nondesirability and (2) to restore her to the status of a desirable tenant. Determination confirmed and petition dismissed on the merits, without costs. It is our opinion that the determination under review is supported by substantial evidence presented at the fair hearing accorded petitioner and her husband by respondent. Rabin, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Margett and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 897, 377 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talavera-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1975.