Talavera v. Galaxy Bilingual Printing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Talavera v. Galaxy Bilingual Printing

205 A.D.2d 369, 614 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6290

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 369 (Talavera v. Galaxy Bilingual Printing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Talavera v. Galaxy Bilingual Printing, 205 A.D.2d 369, 614 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6290 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, Queens County (Stanley B. Katz, J.), entered on or about January 22, 1992, which, to the extent appealed from, granted the third-party plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the answer of third-party defendant Security Mutual Insurance Co. and declared that third-party plaintiff Galaxy Bilingual Printing gave timely notice of the October 1, 1988 accident involving plaintiff Arquimides Talavera and that Security Mutual has a duty to defend Galaxy, affirmed for the reasons stated by the IAS Court, without costs. Concur—Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, Queens County (Stanley B. Katz, J.), entered on or about January 22, 1992, which, to the extent appealed from, granted the third-party plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the answer of third-party defendant Security Mutual Insurance Co. and declared that third-party plaintiff Galaxy Bilingual Printing gave timely notice of the October 1, 1988 accident involving plaintiff Arquimides Talavera and that Security Mutual has a duty to defend Galaxy, affirmed for the reasons stated by the IAS Court, without costs. Concur—Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 369, 614 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talavera-v-galaxy-bilingual-printing-nyappdiv-1994.