Talarico v. Brookhaven Memorial Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Talarico v. Brookhaven Memorial Hospital

55 A.D.2d 949, 391 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10242

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 A.D.2d 949 (Talarico v. Brookhaven Memorial Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Talarico v. Brookhaven Memorial Hospital, 55 A.D.2d 949, 391 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10242 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the New York State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated December 29, 1975, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint after an investigative finding of no probable cause to believe that the respondents engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices because of age. Order confirmed and petition dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The record does not evidence anything which suggests that the respondents engaged in discriminatory practices. Therefore, it was not an abuse of discretion for the [950]*950State Division of Human Rights to have dismissed the complaint because of no probable cause. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the New York State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated December 29, 1975, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint after an investigative finding of no probable cause to believe that the respondents engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices because of age. Order confirmed and petition dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The record does not evidence anything which suggests that the respondents engaged in discriminatory practices. Therefore, it was not an abuse of discretion for the [950]*950State Division of Human Rights to have dismissed the complaint because of no probable cause. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 949, 391 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talarico-v-brookhaven-memorial-hospital-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack