Talamon v. Myers

15 La. Ann. 257
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 1860
StatusPublished

This text of 15 La. Ann. 257 (Talamon v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Talamon v. Myers, 15 La. Ann. 257 (La. 1860).

Opinion

Voorhies, J.

The plaintiffs sue as holders of a promissory note drawn by the defendant, John Myers, to the order of 0. Talamon. There are 'two special endorsements : the first by 0. Talamon to 0. Talamon & Co.; and the second by 0. Talamon <6 Co. to the plaintiffs, 0, Talamon S Dessommes.

The only question presented is whether the petition should have disclosed or alleged these special endorsements, and proof administered of their execution. The District Judge admitted the note in evidence, overruling the objections of the defendant, who thereupon took a bill of exceptions.

It was incumbent on the plaintiffs, if not to allege the endorsements, at least to prove them. 2 Greenleaf Evidence, § 163; 5 An. 642, Ferguson, Adm’r, v. King, Curator; 13 An. 457, S. Robb & Co. v. Bailey; 10 An. 460, Clannon v. Calhoun.

It is, therefore, ordered and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be avoided and reversed; and that the plaintiffs’ demand be rejected as in case of nonsuit, with costs in both courts.

Land, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 La. Ann. 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/talamon-v-myers-la-1860.