Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Ins. Assn.

California Court of Appeal

Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Ins. Assn.

16 P.2d 312, 127 Cal. App. 758, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 519

California Court of Appeal·Decided November 30, 1932·No. Docket No. 8792.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] Under the authority of section 3, Rule V, of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, respondent moves to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment upon the ground that the appeal was *Page 759 taken for delay only and that the questions on which the decision of the case depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument. After examining the transcript on appeal in connection with the points made in appellant's brief it is our opinion that the appeal presents a debatable question of law, and therefore the motion is denied.

Thompson (R.L.), J., and Plummer, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

[1] Under the authority of section 3, Rule V, of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, respondent moves to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment upon the ground that the appeal was *Page 759 taken for delay only and that the questions on which the decision of the case depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument. After examining the transcript on appeal in connection with the points made in appellant's brief it is our opinion that the appeal presents a debatable question of law, and therefore the motion is denied.

Thompson (R.L.), J., and Plummer, J., concurred.

Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Ins. Assn., 16 P.2d 312, 127 Cal. App. 758, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 519 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

16 P.2d 312 (Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Ins. Assn.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related