Takamine v. Kohman

D.C. Circuit

Takamine v. Kohman

296 F. 1021, 54 App. D.C. 274, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3468

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 3, 1924

DocketNo. 1627

StatusPublished

This text of 296 F. 1021 (Takamine v. Kohman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Takamine v. Kohman, 296 F. 1021, 54 App. D.C. 274, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3468 (D.C. Cir. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PFR CURIAM.

This appeal is from concurrent decisions in an interference proceeding concerning a method of making bread, and involves an application and a patent issued prior to the filing date of the application. The case turns upon questions of fact, and while the burden in the Patent Office was heavily upon appellant, it is still heavier here. Bungay v. Grey, 52 App. D. C. 63, 65, 281 Fed. 423. A careful review of the extended opinions of the Patent Office tribunals, in the light of appellant’s argument and brief, has failed to cause us to reach a conclusion different from that reached below. Consequently, we affirm the decision.

Affirmed."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PFR CURIAM.

This appeal is from concurrent decisions in an interference proceeding concerning a method of making bread, and involves an application and a patent issued prior to the filing date of the application. The case turns upon questions of fact, and while the burden in the Patent Office was heavily upon appellant, it is still heavier here. Bungay v. Grey, 52 App. D. C. 63, 65, 281 Fed. 423. A careful review of the extended opinions of the Patent Office tribunals, in the light of appellant’s argument and brief, has failed to cause us to reach a conclusion different from that reached below. Consequently, we affirm the decision.

Affirmed."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 F. 1021, 54 App. D.C. 274, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/takamine-v-kohman-cadc-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack