Takach v. Radice

59 A.2d 624, 142 N.J. Eq. 243, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 656
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 13, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.2d 624 (Takach v. Radice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Takach v. Radice, 59 A.2d 624, 142 N.J. Eq. 243, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 656 (N.J. 1948).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Jayne, and reported at 140 N. J. Eq. 308.

For affirmance — Bodine, Donges, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Wells, Dill, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 8.

For reversal — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Hehee, Bueling, Feeund, JJ. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 A.2d 624, 142 N.J. Eq. 243, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/takach-v-radice-nj-1948.