Tajuan Williams v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of Tajuan Williams v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Tajuan Williams v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
January 3, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 160690 (7) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement TAJUAN WILLIAMS, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices Plaintiff,
V SC: 160690 AGC: 19-0615 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant. __________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the December 17, 2019 order is denied because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. Within 21 days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall pay the $25.00 initial partial fee, submit a copy of the December 17, 2019 order, and refile a copy of the pleadings as ordered. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this complaint.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 3, 2020 izm Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tajuan Williams v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tajuan-williams-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2020.