Tajkarimi v. Baker Pool & Spa, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tajkarimi v. Baker Pool & Spa, Inc.

502 S.W.3d 69, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2016 WL 6210813

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 25, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103942

StatusPublished

This text of 502 S.W.3d 69 (Tajkarimi v. Baker Pool & Spa, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tajkarimi v. Baker Pool & Spa, Inc., 502 S.W.3d 69, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2016 WL 6210813 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Amir Tajkarimi appeals from the judgment dismissing his petition for breach of [70]*70contract and negligence against Baker Pool & Spa, Inc. Tajkarimi has no standing to sue Baker Pool for breach and also failed to state a claim for negligence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Amir Tajkarimi appeals from the judgment dismissing his petition for breach of [70]*70contract and negligence against Baker Pool & Spa, Inc. Tajkarimi has no standing to sue Baker Pool for breach and also failed to state a claim for negligence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 S.W.3d 69, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2016 WL 6210813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tajkarimi-v-baker-pool-spa-inc-moctapp-2016.