Tajkarimi v. Baker Pool & Spa, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tajkarimi v. Baker Pool & Spa, Inc.

502 S.W.3d 69, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2016 WL 6210813

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 25, 2016·No. No. ED 103942·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Amir Tajkarimi appeals from the judgment dismissing his petition for breach of [70] contract and negligence against Baker Pool & Spa, Inc. Tajkarimi has no standing to sue Baker Pool for breach and also failed to state a claim for negligence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Amir Tajkarimi appeals from the judgment dismissing his petition for breach of [70] contract and negligence against Baker Pool & Spa, Inc. Tajkarimi has no standing to sue Baker Pool for breach and also failed to state a claim for negligence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Tajkarimi v. Baker Pool & Spa, Inc., 502 S.W.3d 69, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2016 WL 6210813 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

502 S.W.3d 69 (Tajkarimi v. Baker Pool & Spa, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.