Tajay Stephens v. State
This text of Tajay Stephens v. State (Tajay Stephens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 3, 2018
NO. 03-17-00117-CR
Tajay Stephens, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the judgment
requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction. Therefore,
the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to change the reference to manufacturing of a
controlled substance to possession of a controlled substance and to delete the reference to
indazole. The judgment, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to
pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tajay Stephens v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tajay-stephens-v-state-texapp-2018.