Taj Garner v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 8, 2010
Docket14-10-00050-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Taj Garner v. State (Taj Garner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taj Garner v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 8, 2010.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00050-CR

NO. 14-10-00056-CR

TAJ GARNER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1216126 & 1216009

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered pleas of guilty to two charges of aggravated robbery.  Appellant and the State agreed that appellant’s punishment would not exceed confinement in prison for more than 25 years.  In accordance with the terms of this agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on January 5, 2010, to confinement for 20 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a timely, written notice of appeal.  We dismiss the appeal. 

An agreement that places a cap on punishment is a plea bargain for purposes of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2).  Waters v. State, 124 S.W.3d 825, 826–27 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref’d).  Because appellant’s plea was made pursuant to a plea bargain, he may appeal only matters raised by a written pre-trial motion or with the trial court’s permission. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  Appellant is not appealing any pre-trial rulings.  Although the trial court erroneously certified that these cases were not plea bargains and appellant had the right to appeal, the court corrected the erroneous certification in a hearing held pursuant to an abatement order of this court.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Seymore, and Brown.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waters v. State
124 S.W.3d 825 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Taj Garner v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taj-garner-v-state-texapp-2010.