Taitz v. Nishimura
This text of Taitz v. Nishimura (Taitz v. Nishimura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000014 12-JAN-2012 12:52 PM
NO. SCPW-12-0000014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
DR. ORLY TAITZ, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE RHONDA A. NISHIMURA, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Dr. Orly Taitz's
petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that petitioner fails
to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. See Kema v.
Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of
mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless
the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to
relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the
alleged wrong or obtain the requested action. Such writs are not
intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the
lower courts, nor are they intended to serve as legal remedies in
lieu of normal appellate procedures. ). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, January 12, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Taitz v. Nishimura, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taitz-v-nishimura-haw-2012.