Taitz v. Colvin

Fourth Circuit

Taitz v. Colvin

585 F. App'x 277

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 25, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1773

StatusPublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 277 (Taitz v. Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taitz v. Colvin, 585 F. App'x 277 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Orly Taitz appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging failure to comply with a Freedom of Information Act request; denying Taitz’s motion to reconsider; and denying her motion to reopen and recuse. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taitz v. Colvin, No. 1:18— cv-01878-ELH (D.Md. May 13, 2014; June 13, 2014; July 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Orly Taitz appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging failure to comply with a Freedom of Information Act request; denying Taitz’s motion to reconsider; and denying her motion to reopen and recuse. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taitz v. Colvin, No. 1:18— cv-01878-ELH (D.Md. May 13, 2014; June 13, 2014; July 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 F. App'x 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taitz-v-colvin-ca4-2014.