Taitelman v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Taitelman v. City of New York

87 A.D.2d 574, 450 N.Y.S.2d 407, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15832

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.D.2d 574 (Taitelman v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taitelman v. City of New York, 87 A.D.2d 574, 450 N.Y.S.2d 407, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

In a personal injury action, plaintiffs appeal from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kunzeman, J.), dated March 30, 1981 and May 15, 1981, which, respectively, (1) granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the action and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion to compel acceptance of the complaint, and (2) denied plaintiffs’ motion, denominated one pursuant to CPLR 5015 to vacate the prior order, and “adhered” to “the court’s original decision”. (The latter motion was in reality one for reargument. We deem the order entered thereon to have granted reargument and adhered to the original determination.) Appeal from the order dated March 30, 1981, dismissed, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by the order dated May 15, 1981. Order dated May 15, 1981 affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a personal injury action, plaintiffs appeal from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kunzeman, J.), dated March 30, 1981 and May 15, 1981, which, respectively, (1) granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the action and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion to compel acceptance of the complaint, and (2) denied plaintiffs’ motion, denominated one pursuant to CPLR 5015 to vacate the prior order, and “adhered” to “the court’s original decision”. (The latter motion was in reality one for reargument. We deem the order entered thereon to have granted reargument and adhered to the original determination.) Appeal from the order dated March 30, 1981, dismissed, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by the order dated May 15, 1981. Order dated May 15, 1981 affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 574, 450 N.Y.S.2d 407, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taitelman-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1982.