Tait v. Sweetbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tait v. Sweetbaum

236 A.D. 739

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1932·Published

Opinion

Order denying motion of defendant Sweetbaum to dismiss [740]*740amended complaint for insufficiency reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on authority of Paul v. Fargo (84 App. Div. 9) and Sachs v. Weinstein (208 id. 360). Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs on the ground that the plaintiff in this action was not a party to the divorce action. She came into the case voluntarily and, therefore, was not maliciously prosecuted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion of defendant Sweetbaum to dismiss [740]*740amended complaint for insufficiency reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on authority of Paul v. Fargo (84 App. Div. 9) and Sachs v. Weinstein (208 id. 360). Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs on the ground that the plaintiff in this action was not a party to the divorce action. She came into the case voluntarily and, therefore, was not maliciously prosecuted.

Tait v. Sweetbaum, 236 A.D. 739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

236 A.D. 739 (Tait v. Sweetbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related