Tait v. Matthews

33 Tex. 112
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 33 Tex. 112 (Tait v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tait v. Matthews, 33 Tex. 112 (Tex. 1870).

Opinion

Walker, J.

Any errors which might have been committed by the court prior to the rendition of a judgment by the consent of the parties are waived, and will not now be noticed by this court. The principles involved in most of the exceptions have been settled by [113]*113ibis court in the case of Buffalo Bayou, Brazos and Colorado Bail-road Company v. Gfeorge A. Ferris, 26 Texas, 588.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed with damages. .

Affirmed. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nasrin F. Khan v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014
Alexander v. Alexander
373 S.W.2d 800 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1963)
Ashorn v. Farmers Royalty Holding Co.
149 S.W.2d 995 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Pope v. Powers
91 S.W.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Posey v. Plains Pipe Line Co.
39 S.W.2d 1100 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Duke v. Gilbreath
10 S.W.2d 412 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Tex. 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tait-v-matthews-tex-1870.