Tait v. Matthews
This text of 33 Tex. 112 (Tait v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Any errors which might have been committed by the court prior to the rendition of a judgment by the consent of the parties are waived, and will not now be noticed by this court. The principles involved in most of the exceptions have been settled by [113]*113ibis court in the case of Buffalo Bayou, Brazos and Colorado Bail-road Company v. Gfeorge A. Ferris, 26 Texas, 588.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed with damages. .
Affirmed. •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 Tex. 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tait-v-matthews-tex-1870.