Tait v. Matthews
33 Tex. 112
Opinion
Any errors which might have been committed by the court prior to the rendition of a judgment by the consent of the parties are waived, and will not now be noticed by this court. The principles involved in most of the exceptions have been settled by [113]*113ibis court in the case of Buffalo Bayou, Brazos and Colorado Bail-road Company v. Gfeorge A. Ferris, 26 Texas, 588.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed with damages. .
Affirmed. •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tait v. Matthews, 33 Tex. 112 (Tex. 1870).
33 Tex. 112 (Tait v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nasrin F. Khan v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014
Alexander v. Alexander
373 S.W.2d 800 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1963)
Ashorn v. Farmers Royalty Holding Co.
149 S.W.2d 995 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Pope v. Powers
91 S.W.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Posey v. Plains Pipe Line Co.
39 S.W.2d 1100 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Duke v. Gilbreath
10 S.W.2d 412 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)