Tait v. Lattingtown Harbor Development Co.
188 N.E.2d 794, 12 N.Y.2d 947
This text of 188 N.E.2d 794 (Tait v. Lattingtown Harbor Development Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tait v. Lattingtown Harbor Development Co., 188 N.E.2d 794, 12 N.Y.2d 947 (N.Y. 1963).
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the judgment appealed from does not necessarily affect the final judgment in this action. Where a motion is made for counsel fees within an action, the determination of that motion lacks finality (Weinstein v. Behn, 298 N. Y. 506; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 36, subd. [e]; § 39).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Weinstein v. Behn
80 N.E.2d 656 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
188 N.E.2d 794, 12 N.Y.2d 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tait-v-lattingtown-harbor-development-co-ny-1963.