Taintor v. Hattemer
This text of 273 A.D. 812 (Taintor v. Hattemer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Time of defendants-respondents to answer extended until twenty days after the entry of the order hereon. Permission to renew motions under rules 107 and 90 of the Rules of Civil Practice denied, as unnecessary. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See ante, p. 791.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D. 812, 76 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taintor-v-hattemer-nyappdiv-1948.