Taines v. Taines

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Taines v. Taines

427 So. 2d 334, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20255

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 1983·No. Nos. 82-1046, 82-1047 and 82-1265·Published

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

Appellant challenges an amended order on appellee’s motion for an accounting. The court interpreted the property settlement agreement entered by the parties in their 1976 proceeding to dissolve their marriage and entered rulings to implement its provisions. We find no merit in the husband’s contention that either the court’s construction or its dispositions in connection with enforcement were unreasonable. See Clark v. Clark, 79 So.2d 426 (Fla.1955); Halie v. Wickersham, 103 Fla. 254, 137 So. 226 (1931). We therefore affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BASKIN, Judge.

Appellant challenges an amended order on appellee’s motion for an accounting. The court interpreted the property settlement agreement entered by the parties in their 1976 proceeding to dissolve their marriage and entered rulings to implement its provisions. We find no merit in the husband’s contention that either the court’s construction or its dispositions in connection with enforcement were unreasonable. See Clark v. Clark, 79 So.2d 426 (Fla.1955); Halie v. Wickersham, 103 Fla. 254, 137 So. 226 (1931). We therefore affirm.

Taines v. Taines, 427 So. 2d 334, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20255 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

427 So. 2d 334 (Taines v. Taines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related