Taines v. Taines
This text of 427 So. 2d 334 (Taines v. Taines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant challenges an amended order on appellee’s motion for an accounting. The court interpreted the property settlement agreement entered by the parties in their 1976 proceeding to dissolve their marriage and entered rulings to implement its provisions. We find no merit in the husband’s contention that either the court’s construction or its dispositions in connection with enforcement were unreasonable. See Clark v. Clark, 79 So.2d 426 (Fla.1955); Halie v. Wickersham, 103 Fla. 254, 137 So. 226 (1931). We therefore affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
427 So. 2d 334, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taines-v-taines-fladistctapp-1983.