Taines v. Taines

427 So. 2d 334, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20255
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 1983
DocketNos. 82-1046, 82-1047 and 82-1265
StatusPublished

This text of 427 So. 2d 334 (Taines v. Taines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taines v. Taines, 427 So. 2d 334, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20255 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

Appellant challenges an amended order on appellee’s motion for an accounting. The court interpreted the property settlement agreement entered by the parties in their 1976 proceeding to dissolve their marriage and entered rulings to implement its provisions. We find no merit in the husband’s contention that either the court’s construction or its dispositions in connection with enforcement were unreasonable. See Clark v. Clark, 79 So.2d 426 (Fla.1955); Halie v. Wickersham, 103 Fla. 254, 137 So. 226 (1931). We therefore affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. Clark
79 So. 2d 426 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
Halie v. Wickersham
137 So. 226 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
427 So. 2d 334, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taines-v-taines-fladistctapp-1983.