Taines v. Galvin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Taines v. Galvin

272 So. 2d 824

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 29, 1973

DocketNo. 72-481

StatusPublished

This text of 272 So. 2d 824 (Taines v. Galvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taines v. Galvin, 272 So. 2d 824 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

WALDEN, Judge.

We have examined the recall affidavits with care with regard to the requirement of the City Charter, the statutes, and the case law of this state. We find that the trial court did not err in determining them insufficient and entering the injunction here appealed. Richard v. Tomlinson, Fla.1951, 49 So.2d 798; Joyner v. Shuman, Fla.App. 1959, 116 So.2d 472; Tolar v. Johns, Fla.App. 1962, 147 So.2d 196.

No reversible error or departure from the essential requirements having been made to appear, the judgment is

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and CROSS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALDEN, Judge.

We have examined the recall affidavits with care with regard to the requirement of the City Charter, the statutes, and the case law of this state. We find that the trial court did not err in determining them insufficient and entering the injunction here appealed. Richard v. Tomlinson, Fla.1951, 49 So.2d 798; Joyner v. Shuman, Fla.App. 1959, 116 So.2d 472; Tolar v. Johns, Fla.App. 1962, 147 So.2d 196.

No reversible error or departure from the essential requirements having been made to appear, the judgment is

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and CROSS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 So. 2d 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taines-v-galvin-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack