Taines v. Galvin
272 So. 2d 824
Opinion
We have examined the recall affidavits with care with regard to the requirement of the City Charter, the statutes, and the case law of this state. We find that the trial court did not err in determining them insufficient and entering the injunction here appealed. Richard v. Tomlinson, Fla.1951, 49 So.2d 798; Joyner v. Shuman, Fla.App. 1959, 116 So.2d 472; Tolar v. Johns, Fla.App. 1962, 147 So.2d 196.
No reversible error or departure from the essential requirements having been made to appear, the judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taines v. Galvin, 272 So. 2d 824 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).
272 So. 2d 824 (Taines v. Galvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tolar v. Johns
147 So. 2d 196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Richard v. Tomlinson
49 So. 2d 798 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)
Joyner v. Shuman
116 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)