Tailor v. DSCYF

Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided February 17, 2020·No. 276, 2019·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JOSH TAILOR, SR.,1 § § No. 276, 2019

Respondent Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below: Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware §

DEPARTMENT OF SERVICES FOR § File No. 18-11-06TN CHILDREN, YOUTH AND THEIR § Petition No. 18-34790 FAMILIES, § §

Petitioner Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: February 5, 2020 Decided: February 14, 2020 Corrected: February 17, 2020

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VAUGHN and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices.

ORDER

This 17th day of February 2020, the Court having considered this matter on

the briefs filed by the parties has determined that the final judgment of the Family

Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Family

Court in its order dated May 30, 2019.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the

Family Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tailor v. DSCYF, (Del. 2020).

Tailor v. DSCYF (Tailor v. DSCYF) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.