Tai Kee v. Mayo

241 F. 990, 154 C.C.A. 662, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1848
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 1917
DocketNo. 2984
StatusPublished

This text of 241 F. 990 (Tai Kee v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tai Kee v. Mayo, 241 F. 990, 154 C.C.A. 662, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1848 (5th Cir. 1917).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following the ruling made in the case of Lee Wong Hin v. Mayo, Commissioner of Immigration, 240 Fed. 368, — C. C. A. — (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, present term), the order of the District Court in the above-entitled cause,- dismissing appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, is reversed, and said cause is remanded to the District Court, with direction to entertain the petition and grant the writ, unless the United States, within such, time as the District Judge deems reasonable, shall institute proceedings against the relator under the provisions of the Chinese Exclusion Act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee Wong Hin v. Mayo
240 F. 368 (Fifth Circuit, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 F. 990, 154 C.C.A. 662, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tai-kee-v-mayo-ca5-1917.