Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

228 F.3d 998, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11307, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8492, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 26058, 2000 WL 1552473
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2000·No. Nos. 99-15641, 99-15771·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Judges Politz, Reinhardt, and Hawkins voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Reinhardt and Hawkins voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Politz recommended denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

A judge of the court called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing. Fed. R.App. P. 35(f).

[999]*999The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 228 F.3d 998, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11307, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8492, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 26058, 2000 WL 1552473 (9th Cir. 2000).

228 F.3d 998 (Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related