Tahmisyan v. Calderon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tahmisyan v. Calderon

197 A.D.2d 617, 604 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9765

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 1993·Published

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract of sale of real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.), dated June 6, 1991, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination in an order entered October 10, 1990, granting the plaintiff specific performance.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant has presented no triable issues of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract of sale of real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.), dated June 6, 1991, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination in an order entered October 10, 1990, granting the plaintiff specific performance.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant has presented no triable issues of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Tahmisyan v. Calderon, 197 A.D.2d 617, 604 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

197 A.D.2d 617 (Tahmisyan v. Calderon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.