Tahi Dayon Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 27, 2019·No. 14-19-00128-CR·Published

Opinion

Abatement Order filed June 27, 2019

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-19-00128-CR ____________

TAHI DAYON WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1571570

ABATEMENT ORDER

The trial court denied appellant’s motion to suppress certain out-of-court identifications of appellant and stated it would make findings of fact and conclusions of law at a later time. No such findings and conclusions of law have been filed. See State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 698–99 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress and have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this court on or before August 26, 2019. If the trial court’s findings were dictated into the record, the trial court is directed to include those findings in a supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before August 26, 2019.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tahi Dayon Williams v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Tahi Dayon Williams v. State (Tahi Dayon Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cullen
195 S.W.3d 696 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)