Tagupa v. VIPDESK

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tagupa v. VIPDESK. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Haw. 468
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided December 11, 2014·No. SCWC-13-0002084·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0002084

11-DEC-2014

02:32 PM

SCWC-13-0002084

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

LOTTIE TAGUPA,

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

VIPDESK

Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0002084; CIV. NO. 3RC12-1-297H)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Lottie Tagupa’s

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on October 30, 2014, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days pursuant to

Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, December 11, 2014.

Lottie Tagupa /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Robert D. Triantos and Edmund W.K. Haitsuka /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tagupa v. VIPDESK, (haw 2014).

Tagupa v. VIPDESK (Tagupa v. VIPDESK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.