Tagupa v. VIPDESK
This text of Tagupa v. VIPDESK (Tagupa v. VIPDESK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0002084 11-DEC-2014 02:32 PM
SCWC-13-0002084
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
LOTTIE TAGUPA,
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
VIPDESK
Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-13-0002084; CIV. NO. 3RC12-1-297H)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Lottie Tagupa’s
Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on October 30, 2014,
is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for
retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, December 11, 2014.
Lottie Tagupa /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Robert D. Triantos and Edmund W.K. Haitsuka /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tagupa v. VIPDESK, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tagupa-v-vipdesk-haw-2014.