Tagupa v. VIPDESK
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCWC-13-0002084
11-DEC-2014
02:32 PM
SCWC-13-0002084
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
LOTTIE TAGUPA,
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
VIPDESK
Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0002084; CIV. NO. 3RC12-1-297H)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Lottie Tagupa’s
Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on October 30, 2014, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days pursuant to
Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, December 11, 2014.
Lottie Tagupa /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
Robert D. Triantos and Edmund W.K. Haitsuka /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tagupa v. VIPDESK (Tagupa v. VIPDESK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.