Tagle, Sr. Vs. The Seventh Jud. Dist. Ct.

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: January 31, 2020
• Docket: 80060
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

VICTOR TAGLE, SR., No. 80060 Petitioner, vs. THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILED COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE JAN 3 1 2020 PINE, ELIZABETH A 6ROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Respondent. BY

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

In this original petition, which we have construed as a petition for a writ of mandamus, petitioner appears to seek an order directing the district court to file his civil complaint. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b). We reiterate that "[p]etitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

PiadAP , C.J. Pickering

Hardesty Cadish

cc: Victor Tagle, Sr. Attorney General/Carson City White Pine County Clerk

'Petitioner's failure to provide timely proof of service of the petition constitutes an additional basis upon which to deny relief. NRAP 21(a)(1).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 0413)0 2 i• ra 1.14:1 .ar.331