Taggart v. Waters

Michigan Supreme Court

Taggart v. Waters

73 N.W. 885, 115 Mich. 638, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 602

DecidedJanuary 25, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 73 N.W. 885 (Taggart v. Waters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taggart v. Waters, 73 N.W. 885, 115 Mich. 638, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 602 (Mich. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs brought suit in justice’s court. Defendant appeared specially, and moved to quash the case, because the justice had written him that he had the claim for collection, and had been instructed to write him, and inform him that suit would be brought if it was not paid. Plaintiffs had judgment. ■ Defendant took a special appeal to the circuit court, where it was sustained.

The court was in error. The case is ruled by Moon v. Stevens, 53 Mich. 144.

• Reversed, and court below directed to proceed to trial upon the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs brought suit in justice’s court. Defendant appeared specially, and moved to quash the case, because the justice had written him that he had the claim for collection, and had been instructed to write him, and inform him that suit would be brought if it was not paid. Plaintiffs had judgment. ■ Defendant took a special appeal to the circuit court, where it was sustained.

The court was in error. The case is ruled by Moon v. Stevens, 53 Mich. 144.

• Reversed, and court below directed to proceed to trial upon the merits.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 N.W. 885, 115 Mich. 638, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taggart-v-waters-mich-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack