Taggart v. Vogel
This text of 285 A.D. 974 (Taggart v. Vogel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered on the verdict of the jury. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. In our opinion the charge was entirely adequate and fair and as a whole correctly set forth the applicable rules of law. Plaintiff’s request to charge “the Traffic Regulations of the City of New York” was so indefinite and uncertain that the refusal to grant the same did not, under the circumstances here presented, constitute prejudicial error. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldock and Ughetta, JJ. [See post, p. 1184.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 A.D. 974, 138 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taggart-v-vogel-nyappdiv-1955.