Taggart v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Taggart v. State

1912 OK CR 360, 124 P. 1134, 7 Okla. Crim. 745, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 247

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 21, 1912

DocketNo. A-1467.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 360 (Taggart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taggart v. State, 1912 OK CR 360, 124 P. 1134, 7 Okla. Crim. 745, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 247 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, P. D. Taggart, was at the April, 1911, term of the county court of Oklahoma county, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and was adjudged to pay a fine of five hundred ■dollars and be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of six months. Judgment was rendered against the accused on the 28th day of June, 1911. The petition in error and ease-made were filed in this court on the 3rd day of November, 1911, long after the time provided by law within which the appeal could be taken. The attorney general has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not filed within the time provided by the statute, and that this court is without jurisdiction to review the same. The motion is sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, P. D. Taggart, was at the April, 1911, term of the county court of Oklahoma county, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and was adjudged to pay a fine of five hundred ■dollars and be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of six months. Judgment was rendered against the accused on the 28th day of June, 1911. The petition in error and ease-made were filed in this court on the 3rd day of November, 1911, long after the time provided by law within which the appeal could be taken. The attorney general has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not filed within the time provided by the statute, and that this court is without jurisdiction to review the same. The motion is sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 360, 124 P. 1134, 7 Okla. Crim. 745, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taggart-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.