Tagama v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 11, 2024
DocketCAAP-24-0000050
StatusPublished

This text of Tagama v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. (Tagama v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tagama v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc., (hawapp 2024).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 11-APR-2024 07:56 AM Dkt. 17 ODSD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

MARIO TAGAMA, Claimant-Appellant/Appellant, v. MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, INC., Employer-Appellee/Appellee, and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, Insurance Carrier-Appellee/Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD (CASE NO. AB 2023-103; DCD NO. 2-23-210777)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) On January 22, 2024, self-represented Claimant- Appellant/Appellant Mario Tagama (Tagama) filed in the underlying case, Case No. AB 2023-103, DCD No. 2-2023-210777, a notice of appeal and a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis; (2) On January 23, 2024, the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (LIRAB) denied Tagama's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and the LIRAB clerk notified Tagama to pay the filing fees by February 2, 2024; (3) On February 6, 2024, the LIRAB clerk notified Tagama that the filing fees had not been paid and, as a result, the clerk was not obligated to prepare and file the record on appeal; (4) The record on appeal was due on or before March 22, 2024, Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 11(b)(1), but was not filed because Tagama failed to pay the filing fees or obtain a fee waiver; NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(5) On March 25, 2024, the appellate clerk entered a default of the record on appeal, informing Tagama that the time to docket the appeal had expired, Tagama had not paid the filing fees or obtained an order allowing Tagama to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, the matter would be brought to the court's attention on April 4, 2024, for action that may include dismissal of the appeal, and Tagama could seek relief from default by motion; and (6) Tagama has not taken any further action in this appeal. An appeal may be dismissed where the record on appeal has not been prepared because the appellant failed to pay the required fees or obtain an order allowing the appellant to proceed in forma pauperis. HRAP Rule 11(b)(2), (c)(2). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, April 11, 2024.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tagama v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tagama-v-marriott-ownership-resorts-inc-hawapp-2024.