Taft v. Kent Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Taft v. Kent Circuit Judge

88 N.W. 887, 129 Mich. 312, 1902 Mich. LEXIS 452

DecidedJanuary 28, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 88 N.W. 887 (Taft v. Kent Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taft v. Kent Circuit Judge, 88 N.W. 887, 129 Mich. 312, 1902 Mich. LEXIS 452 (Mich. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Hooker, O. J.

The affairs of the Masonic Life Association went into the hands of a receiver under a decree dated December 12, 1896, upon a petition for its voluntary dissolution under chapter 282, 2 How. Stat. (chapter 300, 3 Comp. Laws), filed August 23, 1896. The receiver reported the amount of claims approved at $57,000, besides [313]*313$11,000 of contested claims. In that case we sustained the .receiver in his levy of assessments upon members to pay death claims which accrued before the petition for dissolution was filed. Calkins v. Angell, 123 Mich. 77 (81 N. W. 977). In the present case a beneficiary asks that the receiver be compelled to levy an assessment for a death claim which accrued after said petition was filed, but before an adjudication was had upon it, and consequently before a receiver was appointed, and while the association was in charge of and under the control of its own officers.

We are of the opinion that the statute prescribes the rule to be followed by providing that the receiver may, by order of the court, continue the business for the purpose of paying all death claims which have accrued at the time of his appointment, as was intimated in Calkins v. Angell, though that case did not assume to decide the question, it being then unnecessary. 2 Comp'. Laws, § 7518; Calkins v. Angell, 123 Mich. 80 (81 N. W. 977). The statute being clear, decisions of other States should not control.

We concur in the decision of the respondent, and the writ should be denied.

Moore and Grant, JJ., concurred. Long and Montgomery, JJ., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hooker, O. J.

The affairs of the Masonic Life Association went into the hands of a receiver under a decree dated December 12, 1896, upon a petition for its voluntary dissolution under chapter 282, 2 How. Stat. (chapter 300, 3 Comp. Laws), filed August 23, 1896. The receiver reported the amount of claims approved at $57,000, besides [313]*313$11,000 of contested claims. In that case we sustained the .receiver in his levy of assessments upon members to pay death claims which accrued before the petition for dissolution was filed. Calkins v. Angell, 123 Mich. 77 (81 N. W. 977). In the present case a beneficiary asks that the receiver be compelled to levy an assessment for a death claim which accrued after said petition was filed, but before an adjudication was had upon it, and consequently before a receiver was appointed, and while the association was in charge of and under the control of its own officers.

We are of the opinion that the statute prescribes the rule to be followed by providing that the receiver may, by order of the court, continue the business for the purpose of paying all death claims which have accrued at the time of his appointment, as was intimated in Calkins v. Angell, though that case did not assume to decide the question, it being then unnecessary. 2 Comp'. Laws, § 7518; Calkins v. Angell, 123 Mich. 80 (81 N. W. 977). The statute being clear, decisions of other States should not control.

We concur in the decision of the respondent, and the writ should be denied.

Moore and Grant, JJ., concurred. Long and Montgomery, JJ., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 N.W. 887, 129 Mich. 312, 1902 Mich. LEXIS 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taft-v-kent-circuit-judge-mich-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack