Taft v. Grosfent

5 Johns. 353
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1810
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Johns. 353 (Taft v. Grosfent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taft v. Grosfent, 5 Johns. 353 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant below waited a reasonable time, and the cause became discontinued by the delay of the justice to attend; for it was an unreasonable delay. The defendant below, during the three hours he waited, was told, that the justice had said he could not come until lx o’clock, and he waited near an hour after that time. The judgment below must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sigler v. Shaffer
19 Ohio C.C. Dec. 423 (Trumbull Circuit Court, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Johns. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taft-v-grosfent-nysupct-1810.