Taft Moody v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Taft Moody v. United States

229 F.2d 740

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMarch 26, 1956

Docket12370_1

StatusPublished

This text of 229 F.2d 740 (Taft Moody v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taft Moody v. United States, 229 F.2d 740 (6th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above case coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, it appears that the verdict of the jury was sustained by the evidence. An examination of the record convinces us that there was no error on the part of the trial court in overruling appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal at the conclusion of the *741 government’s testimony, which was renewed at the close of all of the evidence; and that the trial court, further, committed no reversible error in denying appellant’s motion for a bill of particulars, in refusing any of the appellant’s proposed requests to charge, in the admission of evidence during the course of the trial, or in denying appellant’s motion for a new trial.

In consideration of the foregoing, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above case coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, it appears that the verdict of the jury was sustained by the evidence. An examination of the record convinces us that there was no error on the part of the trial court in overruling appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal at the conclusion of the *741 government’s testimony, which was renewed at the close of all of the evidence; and that the trial court, further, committed no reversible error in denying appellant’s motion for a bill of particulars, in refusing any of the appellant’s proposed requests to charge, in the admission of evidence during the course of the trial, or in denying appellant’s motion for a new trial.

In consideration of the foregoing, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 F.2d 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taft-moody-v-united-states-ca6-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack