Tafoya v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Tafoya v. State

410 A.2d 17, 287 Md. 36

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided February 1, 1980·No. No. 149·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

ORDER

It is this 1st day of February, 1980

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, reversed and case remanded to that Court with direction to reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County and to remand the case to that trial court for a new trial. Pursuant to Maryland Rule 882 f costs are not reallocated as part of the judgment of this Court. See Countess v. State, Nos. 36 and 49, September Term, 1979, decided December 10, 1979.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

ORDER

It is this 1st day of February, 1980

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, reversed and case remanded to that Court with direction to reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County and to remand the case to that trial court for a new trial. Pursuant to Maryland Rule 882 f costs are not reallocated as part of the judgment of this Court. See Countess v. State, Nos. 36 and 49, September Term, 1979, decided December 10, 1979.

Tafoya v. State, 410 A.2d 17, 287 Md. 36 (Md. 1980).

Pincite

410 A.2d 17 (Tafoya v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.