Home/Eleventh Circuit/Taffet v. Southern Co.

Taffet v. Southern Co.

958 F.2d 1514, 1992 WL 70572
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 10, 1992·No. Nos. 90-7088, 90-8452·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taffet v. Southern Co., 958 F.2d 1514, 1992 WL 70572 (11th Cir. 1992).

958 F.2d 1514 (Taffet v. Southern Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Best Telephone Co., Inc.
898 F. Supp. 868 (S.D. Florida, 1994)
Cullum v. Arkla, Inc.
797 F. Supp. 725 (E.D. Arkansas, 1992)
M.R. Taffet and Robert M. Fierman, on Behalf of Themselves and All of the Persons, Corporations, Municipalities, and Other Entities, Other Than the Who Are Similarly Situated v. The Southern Co., Southern Company Services, Inc., Alabama Power Company and Arthur Andersen & Co., Frederick Rodgers Carr, Carr Sales Company, O.E.M. Products, Inc., Timothy Dunn Stokely, III and All Others Similarly Situated v. The Southern Company, Southern Company Services, Inc., Georgia Power Company, and Arthur Andersen & Co.
958 F.2d 1514 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)