Tafel v. O'Connell

279 A.D. 1142, 112 N.Y.S.2d 922
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 16, 1952·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: The record before us contains substantial evidence which, if given credence, would support the determination of the State Liquor Authority that the petitioner violated section 111 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law and the terms of the license issued to her, in that she permitted a person not mentioned in said license to avail himself thereof. The respondents having failed to introduce into evidence the application, the record discloses no evidence to support the further finding of. the Authority that the petitioner made a false material statement in the application for the license issued to her as alleged in the first charge, and therefore said finding is disapproved. All concur. (Review of a determination by the State Liquor Authority revoking petitioner’s liquor license.) Present ■ — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Wheeler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tafel v. O'Connell, 279 A.D. 1142, 112 N.Y.S.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

279 A.D. 1142 (Tafel v. O'Connell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gabler v. New York State Liquor Authority
43 A.D.2d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)