Tadych, Murral Glen
This text of Tadych, Murral Glen (Tadych, Murral Glen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. PD-0107-08
MURRAL GLEN TADYCH, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS
HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam. Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.
O R D E R
The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) and 68.5 because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals and the petition exceeds fifteen pages.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed
in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.
En banc
Delivered: August 20, 2008
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tadych, Murral Glen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tadych-murral-glen-texcrimapp-2008.