Tadlock v. Texas Monumental Committee
This text of 21 Tex. 166 (Tadlock v. Texas Monumental Committee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The authority conferred upon the Chief Justice of the County by the Bankruptcy Act, of the 19th of January, 1841, (Dig. p. 109, et seq.,) is a special and limited authority. The duties assigned appear to be ministerial only ; and there is no provision for an appeal from his refusal to perform them. Repeated decisions of this Court have settled that an appeal does not lie from a tribunal having a special and limited authority conferred on it by Statute, unless it is ■expressly provided for. (Baker v. Chisholm, 3 Tex. R. 157, -and cases cited.) There is no provision in the Act conferring the authority, nor in any general law embracing this case, that we are aware of, which will authorise an appeal. We are of ■opinion, therefore, that no appeal lay to the District Court in this case, and therefore that the appeal to that Court be dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Tex. 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tadlock-v-texas-monumental-committee-tex-1858.