Tadashi Miyaki v. Robert H. Robinson, District Director, Chicago District, Immigration and Naturalization Service

Seventh Circuit

Tadashi Miyaki v. Robert H. Robinson, District Director, Chicago District, Immigration and Naturalization Service

257 F.2d 806

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedSeptember 4, 1958

Docket12233_1

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 257 F.2d 806 (Tadashi Miyaki v. Robert H. Robinson, District Director, Chicago District, Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tadashi Miyaki v. Robert H. Robinson, District Director, Chicago District, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 257 F.2d 806 (7th Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.

Found ineligible for suspension of deportation, § 101(b) (3), Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101(b) (3), on the grounds he lacked good moral character, Miyaki, plaintiff-appellant, filed a complaint for declaratory judgment under § 10, Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009. He appeals from the summary judgment entered against him on motion of the respondent District Director. Administrative remedies have been exhausted and no procedural questions are presented.

Miyaka, a Canadian citizen, was convicted in the Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois, of burning a motor vehicle — an offense under Ill.Rev.Stat.1953, c. 38, par. 50, § 15. He was placed on probation for 24 months and now claims he “is entitled to suspension of his deportation as a matter of law on that the finding of guilty in burning personal property is not such a conviction as to affect . . . (his) moral character, so that he would be eligible for further consideration on his application for suspension.”

This case is controlled by United States ex rel. Hintopoulos v. Shaughnessy, 1957, 353 U.S. 72, 77, 77 S.Ct. 618, 621, 1 L.Ed.2d 652 “Suspension of deportation is a matter of discretion and of administrative grace, not mere eligibility; discretion must be exercised even though statutory prerequisites have been met.”

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.

Found ineligible for suspension of deportation, § 101(b) (3), Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101(b) (3), on the grounds he lacked good moral character, Miyaki, plaintiff-appellant, filed a complaint for declaratory judgment under § 10, Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009. He appeals from the summary judgment entered against him on motion of the respondent District Director. Administrative remedies have been exhausted and no procedural questions are presented.

Miyaka, a Canadian citizen, was convicted in the Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois, of burning a motor vehicle — an offense under Ill.Rev.Stat.1953, c. 38, par. 50, § 15. He was placed on probation for 24 months and now claims he “is entitled to suspension of his deportation as a matter of law on that the finding of guilty in burning personal property is not such a conviction as to affect . . . (his) moral character, so that he would be eligible for further consideration on his application for suspension.”

This case is controlled by United States ex rel. Hintopoulos v. Shaughnessy, 1957, 353 U.S. 72, 77, 77 S.Ct. 618, 621, 1 L.Ed.2d 652 “Suspension of deportation is a matter of discretion and of administrative grace, not mere eligibility; discretion must be exercised even though statutory prerequisites have been met.”

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 F.2d 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tadashi-miyaki-v-robert-h-robinson-district-director-chicago-district-ca7-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack