Tad Jeremy Costin v. State
This text of Tad Jeremy Costin v. State (Tad Jeremy Costin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed March 8, 2018.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-16-00470-CR ____________
TAD JEREMY COSTIN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 228th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1501811
ORDER
The clerk’s record was filed July 20, 2016. Our review has determined that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The State’s brief acknowledges there is no written motion to suppress in the appellate record. The reporter’s record reflects a written motion to suppress was filed “under the old cause numbers.” The record does not contain appellant’s motion to suppress.
Accordingly, the Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before March 16, 2018, containing any Motion to Suppress filed by appellant. If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tad Jeremy Costin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tad-jeremy-costin-v-state-texapp-2018.