Tackett v. Stevenson
This text of 58 N.E. 534 (Tackett v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appellee, as a taxpayer of Decatur county, began this suit to annul, and "to enjoin appellants from executing, a contract whereby the board of commissioners of Decatur county employed appellant Tackett to prepare a general index of certain records in the office of the clerk of the Decatur Circuit Court. The error assigned is’the overruling of a demurrer to the complaint.
The commissioners were acting, or at least assuming to act, under §7853 Burns 1894, §5766 R. S. 1881 and Horner 1897. That section would require appellant Tackett to file his account with the board at least ten days before, the beginning of the term at which he expected to demand pay for his services, and would afford appellee or any other taxpayer of the county the right to contest the claim, before the board j and the statute providing for appeals from decisions of the board would furnish appellee, if unsuccessful before the board, an opportunity to be heard fully in the circuit court. Inasmuch as a plain and adequate legal remedy is provided by statute, that remedy must be pursued and injunction will not lie. Board, etc., v. Dickinson, 153 Ind. 682.
Judgment reversed, with directions to sustain the demurrer to the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 N.E. 534, 155 Ind. 407, 1900 Ind. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tackett-v-stevenson-ind-1900.