Tackett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tackett v. State

894 S.W.2d 262, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 442, 1995 WL 103775

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 14, 1995·No. No. WD 49337·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Murl Tackett appeals from the denial of his application for conditional release from a mental health facility. He contends that the hearing court erred in not granting him a conditional release because: (1) the Public Safety Interest did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Tackett was likely to be a danger to others; (2) the court used an improper standard in its determination; and (3) the court did not make a specific finding that Tackett suffered from a mental disease or defect.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Murl Tackett appeals from the denial of his application for conditional release from a mental health facility. He contends that the hearing court erred in not granting him a conditional release because: (1) the Public Safety Interest did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Tackett was likely to be a danger to others; (2) the court used an improper standard in its determination; and (3) the court did not make a specific finding that Tackett suffered from a mental disease or defect.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Tackett v. State, 894 S.W.2d 262, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 442, 1995 WL 103775 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

894 S.W.2d 262 (Tackett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.