Tackett v. State
423 So. 2d 986, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28597
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tackett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2304 →
Opinion
Our review of the record in the light of the appellant’s points on appeal discloses that no harmful error occurred during the trial. Therefore, the judgment under review is affirmed. As the parties agree, the order entered under Section 947.16(3), Fla. Stat. (1981) should be corrected after remand to provide for the retention of jurisdiction for a specified period of no more than one-third of the sentence. The defendant need not be present when this is accomplished.
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tackett v. State, 423 So. 2d 986, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28597 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
423 So. 2d 986 (Tackett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.