Tackett v. Mayo

276 S.W. 974, 211 Ky. 30, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 802
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)·Decided October 30, 1925·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

■Opinion of the Court by

Judge McCandless

Reversing.

Appellant and appellee were rival candidates for the Democratic nomination for county attorney of Floyd county, Ky., at the late primary election. Appellee was-awarded the certificate of nomination. Appellant contested. The circuit court dismissed the contest and declared appellee nominated, hence this appeal.

From the evidence it appears that both of them through their friends and with their knowledge and consent, were guilty of violations of the Corrupt Practice Act. It follows, then, that neither appellant nor appellee may be declared to have been nominated the candidate aforesaid at the primary.

Hence the judgment herein is reversed and this cause-remanded, with directions that a judgment be entered herein in conformity with this opinion and that each party be required to pay his own costs.

Whole court sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tackett v. Mayo, 276 S.W. 974, 211 Ky. 30, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 802 (Ky. 1925).

276 S.W. 974 (Tackett v. Mayo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kluemper v. Zimmer
41 S.W.2d 1111 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)
Greene v. Cawood
20 S.W.2d 984 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1929)
Walker v. Taylor
20 S.W.2d 727 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1929)