Tacina v. Mers/Mo Goodwill Industries

471 S.W.3d 400, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 979, 2015 WL 5714877
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 29, 2015·No. No. ED 101988·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeff Tacina (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying his claim for unemployment benefits. The Commission determined Claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he voluntarily quit his job without good cause attributable to his work or employer.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tacina v. Mers/Mo Goodwill Industries, 471 S.W.3d 400, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 979, 2015 WL 5714877 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

471 S.W.3d 400 (Tacina v. Mers/Mo Goodwill Industries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.