Taccino v. National Rural Letter Carriers Ass'n
This text of 166 F. App'x 79 (Taccino v. National Rural Letter Carriers Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William A. Taccino appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this civil action alleging breach of the duty of fair representation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Taccino v. National Rural Letter Carriers Assoc., No. CA-03-2373-1-JFM [80]*80(D.Md. July 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 F. App'x 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taccino-v-national-rural-letter-carriers-assn-ca4-2006.