Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Taborsky v. State

Taborsky v. State

579 So. 2d 146, 1991 WL 41977
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 29, 1991·No. 90-01203·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

579 So.2d 146 (1991)

Petr TABORSKY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 90-01203.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 29, 1991.
Rehearing Denied May 22, 1991.

Stuart C. Markman of Stuart C. Markman, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dell H. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant's convictions and sentence. However, we remand with instructions for the trial court to correct the appellant's order of probation. The order should show that the appellant's convictions were based on a jury having found him guilty rather than his having pled guilty.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taborsky v. State, 579 So. 2d 146, 1991 WL 41977 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

579 So. 2d 146 (Taborsky v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taborsky v. State
659 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Board of Regents v. Taborsky
648 So. 2d 748 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Croft v. Donna Jean Packing Co.
579 So. 2d 146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)