Taborsky v. State
This text of 579 So. 2d 146 (Taborsky v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petr TABORSKY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Stuart C. Markman of Stuart C. Markman, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dell H. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appellant's convictions and sentence. However, we remand with instructions for the trial court to correct the appellant's order of probation. The order should show that the appellant's convictions were based on a jury having found him guilty rather than his having pled guilty.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
579 So. 2d 146, 1991 WL 41977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taborsky-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.